<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: JavaScript&#039;s Defects on Numbers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://inside.java2script.com/2007/08/05/javascripts-defects-on-numbers.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://inside.java2script.com/2007/08/05/javascripts-defects-on-numbers.html</link>
	<description>A Book about Java to JavaScript Details</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 17:01:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: gry dzieci</title>
		<link>http://inside.java2script.com/2007/08/05/javascripts-defects-on-numbers.html#comment-9901</link>
		<dc:creator>gry dzieci</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inside.java2script.com/2007/08/05/javascripts-defects-on-numbers.html#comment-9901</guid>
		<description>Super witryna. Oby tak dalej.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Super witryna. Oby tak dalej.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: baggage policies</title>
		<link>http://inside.java2script.com/2007/08/05/javascripts-defects-on-numbers.html#comment-8644</link>
		<dc:creator>baggage policies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 19:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inside.java2script.com/2007/08/05/javascripts-defects-on-numbers.html#comment-8644</guid>
		<description>First, let me commend your pellucidity on this subject. I am not a pro during this subject, but after reading your write-up, my knowledge has developed substantially. Please tolerate me to catch your rss nourish to remain in contact with any upcoming revisions. Pleasant career and will offer it on to pals and my weblog audience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, let me commend your pellucidity on this subject. I am not a pro during this subject, but after reading your write-up, my knowledge has developed substantially. Please tolerate me to catch your rss nourish to remain in contact with any upcoming revisions. Pleasant career and will offer it on to pals and my weblog audience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://inside.java2script.com/2007/08/05/javascripts-defects-on-numbers.html#comment-8108</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 22:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inside.java2script.com/2007/08/05/javascripts-defects-on-numbers.html#comment-8108</guid>
		<description>That would be because all numbers in javascript are actually 64 bit floating point.
Not all integers higher than 53 bits can be exactly represented as a 64 bit floating point value, hence 0x20000000000000 and 0x20000000000001 are the same.
This is due to the 11 bit exponent and the 1 sign bit. This only leaves 52 bits to store the fraction</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That would be because all numbers in javascript are actually 64 bit floating point.<br />
Not all integers higher than 53 bits can be exactly represented as a 64 bit floating point value, hence 0x20000000000000 and 0x20000000000001 are the same.<br />
This is due to the 11 bit exponent and the 1 sign bit. This only leaves 52 bits to store the fraction</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dualit toaster and kettle</title>
		<link>http://inside.java2script.com/2007/08/05/javascripts-defects-on-numbers.html#comment-7168</link>
		<dc:creator>dualit toaster and kettle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 09:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inside.java2script.com/2007/08/05/javascripts-defects-on-numbers.html#comment-7168</guid>
		<description>I won&#039;t debate along with your conclusions simply I feel you are exact on the money! You&#039;ve come up with a valid case for your sentiments and now I know much more this unusual subject. Thank you this outstanding publish and that i will arrive again for additional.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I won't debate along with your conclusions simply I feel you are exact on the money! You've come up with a valid case for your sentiments and now I know much more this unusual subject. Thank you this outstanding publish and that i will arrive again for additional.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

